In South Africa’s complex labour landscape, understanding the distinction between a review during an employee’s probation period and a performance review is not just best practice, it’s a legal imperative. Although both processes involve the evaluation of employee performance, they occur at different stages of the employment relationship and are governed by distinct legal standards under the Labour Relations Act (LRA). Confusing the two processes can expose employers to unnecessary legal risk, while a clear understanding and implementation can help cultivate a fair, compliant, and performance-driven workplace.

Purpose of Probationary and Performance Reviews

Probationary reviews are conducted during an employee’s probation period, typically between three to six months after employment begins, to assess the employee’s suitability for permanent appointment. The focus is on adaptability, performance, and cultural fit within the organisation. On the other hand, performance reviews are ongoing evaluations conducted after an employee has been confirmed in their role. Their purpose is to monitor progress, guide professional development, manage underperformance, and support career planning. Performance reviews are a cornerstone of a structured performance management system.

Timing of Reviews

Probationary reviews are conducted only during the probation period. They typically culminate in one of three outcomes: confirmation, extension, or termination of employment. On the other hand, performance reviews are conducted at regular intervals, albeit quarterly, biannually, or annually, depending on company policy. These reviews are applied consistently to permanent employees as part of a long-term strategy to manage performance.

Legal Standards and Employee Protection

During probationary reviews, employees may face dismissal for poor performance if the employer has:

  • Acted in good faith;
  • Followed a fair procedure;
  • Provided the employee with guidance, training, and support; and
  • Allowed the employee a reasonable opportunity to improve.

While the standard is more flexible, fairness is still required.

In the case of performance reviews, stricter procedural requirements apply, including:

  • Clearly defined performance standards;
  • Counselling and training;
  • Monitoring and support, and
  • A reasonable period for improvement before dismissal can be considered.

Relevant Case Law

In the case of Apollo Tyres South Africa (Pty) Ltd v CCMA & Others (DA5/11), it was confirmed that dismissals during probation are subject to a more flexible standard, provided the employer acts fairly and follows proper procedures. Moreover, in Matiko v Friedman N.O. & Another (28 November 2024, JHB LC), the Court reaffirmed that while probation allows more leeway, employers must still conduct procedurally and substantively fair dismissals and that Item 8 of Schedule 8 of the Code of Good Practice applies in full.

In Petersen v CCMA & Others (24 May 2024), the Court upheld an employee’s dismissal during probation for inability to perform core job functions, reinforcing that failure to meet essential competencies can justify termination of employment. In the case of Samson v CCMA & Others (14 January 2025, JHB LC), the Court emphasised that dismissals for poor work performance fall under incapacity, not misconduct, and must follow proper performance management steps. Additionally, the case of CEPPWAWU v Metrofile (Pty) Ltd highlighted that, before dismissing an employee for poor performance, employers must provide support and corrective action. Failure to do so can render the dismissal unfair.

Conclusion

Understanding the difference between probationary and performance reviews is essential for lawful and effective employee management. Probationary reviews assess a new employee’s suitability, while performance reviews support the growth and accountability of permanent staff. By applying the appropriate process at the right stage, employers not only remain compliant with the Labour Relations Act but also foster a culture of fairness, productivity, and continuous improvement.